Posted

The U.S. Department of Justice has announced the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative, a new enforcement effort that uses the federal False Claims Act to pursue investigations and prosecutions of recipients of federal funding—including institutions of higher education, research centers and federal contractors—who allegedly falsely certify their compliance with federal civil rights laws.

In “New DOJ Initiative Expands FCA Use to Enforce Civil Rights Compliance and Target DEI Initiatives,” colleagues Thomas C. HillJeffrey P. MetzlerKimberly D. JaimezDylan M. Aste and Jeffrey J. Izant explore the significance of this new Initiative.

Posted

On May 12, 2025, the Criminal Division of the U.S. Department of Justice issued a Memorandum outlining its new approach to white-collar criminal enforcement under the second Trump administration. Observing that “overbroad and unchecked corporate and white-collar enforcement burdens U.S. business and harms U.S. interests,” the Memorandum represents a notable shift in the Department’s tone.

In “DOJ Announces Shift in Approach to Prosecuting Corporate Crime,” colleagues Jeffrey J. Izant and Dylan M. Aste take a closer look at the newly announced changes to the Criminal Division’s enforcement policies.

Posted

On January 8, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued its final rule (28 C.F.R. Part 202) implementing former President Biden’s Executive Order 14117, “Preventing Access to Americans’ Bulk Sensitive Personal Data and United States Government-Related Data by Countries of Concern.” The guide outlines the requirements of a newly implemented Data Security Program (DSP) designed to prevent China, Russia and other foreign adversaries designated by the DOJ from accessing American’s sensitive personal data and U.S. government-related data.

In “DOJ Releases Its Data Security Program Compliance Guide,” colleagues Jeewon K. SerratoTony PhillipsShruti Bhutani AroraSahar J. HafeezChristine MastromonacoLeighton Watson and Sheetal Misra discuss the key components of the DSP and offer thoughts about compliance.

Posted

On April 7, 2025, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche issued a Memorandum titled, “Ending Regulation by Prosecution,” which outlines changes to the approach of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to digital assets and criminal enforcement. The stated goal of the Memorandum, which implements Executive Order 14178 (Strengthening American Leadership in Digital Financial Technology), is to effectuate President Trump’s directive that DOJ “end the regulatory weaponization against digital assets.”

In U.S. Department of Justice Curtails “Regulation by Prosecution” in Digital Asset Enforcement, colleagues Jeffrey J. IzantDavid Oliwenstein and Alexis N. Wansac put the new policy in context and explain why, while the new policy represents a shift in the agency’s tone, the practical effect on digital asset prosecutions may be limited.

Posted

As the 119th Congress begins, with Republicans taking control of both the House and Senate for the first time in five years, companies and nonprofit organizations should anticipate a surge in congressional investigations. Unified control of Congress, coupled with President-elect Trump in the White House, positions Republicans to pursue a sweeping oversight agenda. The question isn’t if there will be investigations—it’s who will be targeted and how to prepare. In New Congress, More Scrutiny? Preparing for Congressional Oversight and Investigations, colleagues Craig J. SapersteinAimee P. GhoshRichard P. DonoghueWilliam M. Sullivan, Jr.Johnna Purcell and Jaria Martin break down what this means for companies and how they should prepare.

Posted

Featured in Legal500’s latest white collar crime guide, colleagues Audrey Koh and Elinor Lee recently co-authored a Q&A that provides an overview of white collar crime laws and regulations specifically applicable in the United Kingdom.

The Q&A also highlights a broad range of key takeaways including recent trends in the industry, the process of investigations and suggested mechanisms, in addition to the relevant laws and regulations.

Posted

Over the last several years, enforcement authorities including the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have aggressively pursued corporate misconduct, particularly in the areas of cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, financial fraud, corruption and sanctions. As a result, public and private companies, as well as their boards, have faced—and continue to face—increasingly complex compliance obligations. In a recent article for Governance Intelligence, colleagues David OliwensteinTony Phillips and Adam Goldberg provide insights on notable DOJ and SEC enforcement trends, what boards need to know, and recommendations on how to mitigate the risk of government investigations.